Call for a competitive Euro

Author: Philipp Hartmannsgruber

In 7 years there should be a Digital Euro (approx. in 2028) — according to the ECB. Already in 2022 there will be the digital Yuan, and after that further digital currencies, e.g. the digital US Dollar.

One would think that with a duration of 7 years, the digital euro will at least fulfill everything that can be expected today: Privacy (anonymity up to, say, 1,000 euros), programmability (smart contracts), instant free transferability anywhere in the world. However, if you ask around in expert circles, it is exactly these things that will be lacking (except perhaps the last point).This begs the question, why will it take 7 years for the Digital Euro to hit the market and why does it not fulfill basic things of today’s cryptocurrencies? To the first question, the answer came that they want to take their time to get everything right and there seems to be no time pressure. Since apparently no programmability is required (many see differently, see for example Digital Euro Association and bankenverband), this is also not planned.
The question is why we need a digital euro in the planned form if we already have “digital money”.

If SEPA Instant Payment were to be available everywhere and even free of charge, we would not need the digital euro — as it is currently planned.
What Europe needs is a digital euro that will be ready for the market in 2–3 years at the latest. However, this must have the full design of a digital currency, as we already know from various other cryptocurrencies.

First and foremost, this includes a certain degree of privacy. For example, payments up to 1,000 euros should be completely anonymous — just like cash. There have already been studies (see Designing a Central Bank Digital Currency with Support for Cash-like Privacy) showing that privacy is possible while preventing money laundering and terrorist financing. Experts such as Jonas Gross, Johannes Sedlmeir, Matthias Babel, Alexander Bechtel, and Benjamin Schellinger should be consulted to assist the ECB in designing the Digital Euro in this regard.

The next important factor is programmability. Blockchains like Ethereum enable smart contracts. And they have been doing so for years and very successfully. Without programmability, the digital euro is missing a crucial factor — without it, it would be useless. As a pure means of payment, we already have a great many alternatives from the private sector that are used significantly more than anything a state (or association of states) could ever create.

Of course, the digital euro must first and foremost be a legal tender. Whether it is issued by the ECB or private banks is of secondary importance in my opinion. Personally, I would prefer it to be issued by the private banks, because they can handle this logistically and technically better than the ECB. The necessary personnel is lacking here.

In my opinion, it makes little sense for a private individual to be able to hold 1,000 euros at the ECB and then have the rest in the account of the bank he trusts. The effort on the part of the ECB would be far too high to provide every European with an account for up to 1,000 euros. Moreover, the question arises as to where the benefit for the consumer is supposed to lie here.

Of course, the properties of money must also be fulfilled by the digital euro.
These are (with my own extension of the classic money functions):
Means of payment: It must be a legally recognized means of payment that is accepted everywhere and does not incur any payment costs.
Store of value: The money must retain its value as best as possible. We have known for a long time that fiat money without a quantity restriction (you can print as much as you want) is inflationary and loses up to 2% of its value per year on average (e.g. in Germany in recent years — currently significantly more). The Digital Euro will not solve this problem, as it will be exactly the same as the Euro is today.
Unit of account: Money must be seen as a unit of account. Everyone must be able to know how much one euro can buy. It must also be divisible (cents).
The digital euro has the possibility of being even more divisible than the previous euro. This means that less than 0.01€ can exist. This is also urgently necessary in the age of Internet of Things (IoT). For micro-payments we need a smaller subdivision than 1 cent.

Should the criteria listed here be taken into account in the conception of the Digital Euro while adhering to the (extended) money functions, and should this be ready for the market in 2–3 years, I am optimistic. If we continue on the current path, I do not think we will need a “digital euro” (as the ECB currently envisions it).

Remarks

If you like this article, we would be happy if you forward it to your colleagues or share it on social networks. More information about the International Token Standardization Association can be found on the Internet, on Twitter, or on LinkedIn.

Philipp J.A. Hartmannsgruber holds a master’s degree in Finance & Accounting and a bachelor’s degree in Economics.
He is Founder & Managing Partner at PJAH Consulting, his own Consulting firm. He is also Head of the Taskforce DeFi and NFT at ITSA (International Token Standardization Association) and Co-Founder & Co-Host of the Cryptoberfest. A Bit’s and Pretzels like 3-day event in September 2022, with the highlight of networking at an own tent at the Oktoberfest.
Recently he joined the DEA (Digital Euro Association) as a fellow.
In 2019 he founded ShareHope, a non-profit NGO, right now in stealth-mode.

About ITSA

ITSA e.V. aims at promoting the development and implementation of comprehensive market standards for blockchain- and DLT-based cryptographic tokens. To increase transparency and safety on global token markets, ITSA e.V. assigns a unique and fork-resilient identifier (the ITIN) to each individual token and classifies the token according to our International Token Classification Framework (ITC). This data is then entered into the TOKENBASE. It is our vision to create the world’s largest DLT token database and see our market standards be implemented across the world. Our working groups are actively driving the development and progress of both the ITIN and the ITC.

• The International Token Identification Number (ITIN) is a 9-digit alphanumeric technical identifier for both fungible and non-fungible DLT-based tokens. Thanks to its underlying Uniform Token Locator (UTL), ITIN presents a unique and fork-resilient identification of tokens. The ITIN also allows for the connecting and matching of other media and data to the token, such as legal contracts or price data, and increases safety and operational transparency when handling these tokens.
• The International Token Classification (ITC) is a multi-dimensional, expandable framework for the classification of tokens. Current dimensions include technological, economic, legal, and regulatory dimensions with multiple sub-dimensions. By mid-2021, there will be at least two new dimensions added, including a tax dimension. So far, our classification framework has been applied to 99% of the token market according to market capitalization of classified tokens.
• ITSA’s Tokenbase currently holds data on over 4000 tokens. Tokenbase is a holistic database for the analysis of tokens and combines our identification and classification data with market and blockchain data from external providers.